Societa' Industrie Elettroniche
So, now you wonder, why does this guy with all his good synthesizer have a SIEL Mono? Well, since I have no sound files up (at least not yet) I can only defend it by saying it sounds unique and that I got it cheap!
I bought this ugly beast back in 1995 and it was my third analogue synth ever. I hesitated to buy a machine without cv/gate control but thought that using the keys for once could be nice and despite all the mockery this has caused me I've kept it and I'm not ashamed to say I love this machine.
I bought it from a guy I didn't know then but whom I know consider a friend. I think he thought he made a really good deal getting rid of this DCO-mono-oneoscillator-organ-wannabe but with the original manual in great condition and a homebuilt case to go with the synth I though 800 SEK (circa 90 EUR) was well spent money.
The Monos main talent is droneing basses, almost Taurus-like sometimes but it can also produce some weird noises and effects. For example, the airplane simulator described in the manual is really convincing... (yes, I mean it!)
Unfortunately the Mono is very italian in many ways. It has cheesy controls (rocker switches and sliders that feels cheap), the design really sucks (wedge-shaped in brown metal casing with tiny little legs to tilt it even more), it uses DCO (though I promise it can sound warm anyway) and everyone says it's impossible to midify.
I and a friend who is more on speaking terms with the soldering iron and electronics were discussing this and with tonnes of help from him and the splendid MTC64 from Doepfer my Mono now has midi control. Since I'm totally against non-reversable modifications (even on a poor SIEL) I used the volume pedal input (already a 5din-socket) for the midi in and double IC-sockets for the oscillator in the Mono.
First, with a lot of extra wiring, an extra PSU, we managed to squeeze three octaves + a C out of the Mono, the same as the layout of the keys. It included an extra board with switches since the Mono has a scanned keyboard like an organ. In addition to this I planned a midicontrol for the octave switch. But while looking into this, comparing the schematics with those of the SIEL Cruise (isn't the net and friends wonderful?) I ran into the possibility of more...
The schematics showed obvious signs of an extra octave below the visible keyboard. I tested and it worked! A just yesterday when taking the Mono apart for the phot session I double checked another idea and found out that it had another octave below the already mentioned one! I can tell you this much, the basses down there are LOOOOOW!
The main feature that I always mention when people wonder why I've kept this beast is the filter. It has three switches (on/off) for lowpass, bandpass and highpass and these can be combined into notch, all etc. The resonance is vicious and probably only surpassed by the one in the Octave Cat SRM.
SIEL is a short form for Societa' Industrie Elettroniche by the way. And yes, the Mono is the little brother of the Cruise but I've never understood the point in having a ugly polyphonic space-waster when I can have a Mono! =)
SIEL Mono specifications;
Happy browsing and don't hesitate to drop me a line at: jesperXelectronic-obsession.se
Also please bear in mind that all pictures and texts are mine so, ask before
you steal or write your own stuff and take your own pictures! Feel free to link
to my pages...